Skip to content
BestERPinKuwait

Buyer guide

ERP Selection Checklist for Kuwait Businesses

A working checklist covering every stage from requirements definition to contract signature. Use it to run your process, or to audit one already underway.

ERP Implementation PracticeReviewed by Editorial Review BoardUpdated

This checklist is deliberately practical. Each item is either done or not done, and each one exists because its absence causes a specific, recurring problem. Work through it in order; the stages depend on one another.

Stage 1 — Before you speak to any vendor

Requirements and readiness

  • A named business owner has been appointed with authority to make decisions
  • The executive sponsor is identified and has agreed a standing review slot
  • Three to five core processes are documented end to end, including exceptions
  • The real approval matrix is written down — document type, threshold, approver, escalation
  • Employee count, expected ERP user count and role count are established separately
  • Entity, branch and warehouse counts are confirmed for today and for a credible three-year plan
  • Existing systems are listed, split into 'replace' and 'retain and integrate'
  • Known data quality problems have been profiled, not assumed
  • A written deployment constraint exists, or has been confirmed not to exist
  • Evaluation criteria and weights have been agreed and published internally
  • A realistic budget band has been agreed with the sponsor

Stage 2 — Building the shortlist

Shortlisting

  • Longlist filtered against hard constraints first — deployment, Arabic, entity count
  • Shortlist reduced to three vendors
  • Each shortlisted product's target business size confirmed against yours
  • For partner-delivered products, the specific partner is identified before demonstrations
  • Reference customers requested in Kuwait or the GCC, in a comparable sector
  • Vendor viability checked — how long the product has existed, and its regional installed base

Stage 3 — Demonstrations

Running demonstrations that reveal fit

  • Your scenarios sent to every vendor at least one week in advance
  • Sample data provided — chart of accounts, item extract, customer list
  • Your approval matrix configured live in the product during the session
  • One full transaction completed in the Arabic interface, if Arabic is required
  • KWD three-decimal handling tested through pricing, discounting and reporting
  • Stock for one item shown across all branches on a single screen
  • A consolidated trial balance produced across your entity structure
  • Each vendor asked to name what the product cannot do well
  • All attendees scored against published criteria before leaving the room

Stage 4 — Commercial and contractual

Before signature

  • Licensing, implementation, migration, customisation and support priced as separate lines
  • All vendors priced against identical stated assumptions
  • Five-year total cost modelled, including support escalation and upgrade re-testing
  • Named consultants and their availability confirmed in writing
  • Internal resource expectation stated by the vendor, by role, by phase, in days
  • Requirements to be met by configuration versus custom development listed explicitly
  • Responsibility and cost for re-testing custom work at each upgrade agreed
  • Written change-control process agreed, including how out-of-scope items are priced
  • Support scope and response commitments in the contract, not in a brochure
  • Data ownership and exit terms confirmed — what you get back, in what format
  • Acceptance criteria for go-live defined and agreed by both parties

Start with a scored shortlist — the ERP Finder applies our published methodology to your requirements.

Find My ERP

Frequently asked questions

Written by

ERP Implementation Practice

Implementation & Delivery

Consultants who deliver ERP implementations for Kuwaiti trading, distribution, manufacturing and service organisations. They contribute the delivery, migration and change-management material on this site.

Reviewed by

Editorial Review Board

Editorial Review

The review board checks every published comparison against the evaluation methodology, confirms that factual claims carry sources, and ensures editorial assessments are labelled as such.

Published
Updated
Last fact-checked

Next step

Get an ERP fit assessment

Turn this guidance into a shortlist. We score every system we evaluate against your requirements and explain the reasoning behind each result.